<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><metadata xml:lang="en">
<Esri>
<CreaDate>20260311</CreaDate>
<CreaTime>00413300</CreaTime>
<ArcGISFormat>1.0</ArcGISFormat>
<ArcGISstyle>FGDC CSDGM Metadata</ArcGISstyle>
<SyncOnce>FALSE</SyncOnce>
<DataProperties>
<itemProps>
<itemName Sync="TRUE">assessed_2022_final_wetlands_points</itemName>
</itemProps>
<coordRef>
<type Sync="TRUE">Projected</type>
<geogcsn Sync="TRUE">GCS_North_American_1983</geogcsn>
<csUnits Sync="TRUE">Linear Unit: Meter (1.000000)</csUnits>
<peXml Sync="TRUE">&lt;ProjectedCoordinateSystem xsi:type='typens:ProjectedCoordinateSystem' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' xmlns:typens='http://www.esri.com/schemas/ArcGIS/2.8.0'&gt;&lt;WKT&gt;PROJCS[&amp;quot;NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_15N&amp;quot;,GEOGCS[&amp;quot;GCS_North_American_1983&amp;quot;,DATUM[&amp;quot;D_North_American_1983&amp;quot;,SPHEROID[&amp;quot;GRS_1980&amp;quot;,6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM[&amp;quot;Greenwich&amp;quot;,0.0],UNIT[&amp;quot;Degree&amp;quot;,0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION[&amp;quot;Transverse_Mercator&amp;quot;],PARAMETER[&amp;quot;False_Easting&amp;quot;,500000.0],PARAMETER[&amp;quot;False_Northing&amp;quot;,0.0],PARAMETER[&amp;quot;Central_Meridian&amp;quot;,-93.0],PARAMETER[&amp;quot;Scale_Factor&amp;quot;,0.9996],PARAMETER[&amp;quot;Latitude_Of_Origin&amp;quot;,0.0],UNIT[&amp;quot;Meter&amp;quot;,1.0],AUTHORITY[&amp;quot;EPSG&amp;quot;,26915]]&lt;/WKT&gt;&lt;XOrigin&gt;-5120900&lt;/XOrigin&gt;&lt;YOrigin&gt;-9998100&lt;/YOrigin&gt;&lt;XYScale&gt;10000&lt;/XYScale&gt;&lt;ZOrigin&gt;-100000&lt;/ZOrigin&gt;&lt;ZScale&gt;10000&lt;/ZScale&gt;&lt;MOrigin&gt;-100000&lt;/MOrigin&gt;&lt;MScale&gt;10000&lt;/MScale&gt;&lt;XYTolerance&gt;0.001&lt;/XYTolerance&gt;&lt;ZTolerance&gt;0.001&lt;/ZTolerance&gt;&lt;MTolerance&gt;0.001&lt;/MTolerance&gt;&lt;HighPrecision&gt;true&lt;/HighPrecision&gt;&lt;WKID&gt;26915&lt;/WKID&gt;&lt;LatestWKID&gt;26915&lt;/LatestWKID&gt;&lt;/ProjectedCoordinateSystem&gt;</peXml>
<projcsn Sync="TRUE">NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_15N</projcsn>
</coordRef>
</DataProperties>
<SyncDate>20220503</SyncDate>
<SyncTime>09435400</SyncTime>
<ModDate>20220503</ModDate>
<ModTime>09435400</ModTime>
</Esri>
<mdChar>
<CharSetCd value="004"/>
</mdChar>
<mdHrLv>
<ScopeCd value="005"/>
</mdHrLv>
<mdContact>
<rpIndName>Kristofor Parson</rpIndName>
<rpOrgName>Minnesota Pollution Control Agency</rpOrgName>
<rpPosName>Data Specialist</rpPosName>
<rpCntInfo>
<cntPhone>
<voiceNum>218-302-6622</voiceNum>
</cntPhone>
<cntAddress addressType="both">
<delPoint>525 S. Lake Ave.</delPoint>
<city>Duluth</city>
<adminArea>MN</adminArea>
<postCode>55802</postCode>
<eMailAdd>kristofor.parson@state.mn.us</eMailAdd>
</cntAddress>
</rpCntInfo>
<role>
<RoleCd value="007"/>
</role>
</mdContact>
<mdDateSt>20220504</mdDateSt>
<mdStanName>ArcGIS Metadata</mdStanName>
<mdStanVer>1.0</mdStanVer>
<distInfo>
<distTranOps>
<onLineSrc>
<linkage>withheld</linkage>
</onLineSrc>
</distTranOps>
</distInfo>
<dataIdInfo>
<idCitation>
<resTitle>Assessed Wetlands Points, Minnesota, 2022</resTitle>
<date>
<pubDate>2022-05-04</pubDate>
</date>
<citRespParty>
<rpOrgName>Minnesota Pollution Control Agency</rpOrgName>
<role>
<RoleCd value="006"/>
</role>
</citRespParty>
<citRespParty>
<rpOrgName>Minnesota Pollution Control Agency</rpOrgName>
<role>
<RoleCd value="010"/>
</role>
</citRespParty>
</idCitation>
<idAbs>This is a proposed set of the centroids of the wetlands assessed by MPCA's surface water quality assessment process for the 2022 303(d)/305(b) integrated report to EPA. These wetlands are a subset and enhancement of the 1:24,000 scale National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). In cases where the NHD does not include wetlands that MPCA has assessed, additional wetlands from the MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Division of Waters lakes database are added. Since the assessed wetlands are a small subset of the NHD and DNR lakes, only that subset is included in the dataset. This dataset includes impaired wetlands which have not yet had a TMDL plan approved by the US EPA as well as wetlands that support aquatic recreation and those that had insufficient information to render a support judgment.</idAbs>
<idPurp>These data are intended to be used for planning, informational, and cartographic purposes related to surface water quality in Minnesota.</idPurp>
<idStatus>
<ProgCd value="001"/>
</idStatus>
<idPoC>
<rpIndName>Kristofor Parson</rpIndName>
<rpOrgName>Minnesota Pollution Control Agency</rpOrgName>
<rpPosName>Data Specialist</rpPosName>
<rpCntInfo>
<cntPhone>
<voiceNum>218-302-6622</voiceNum>
</cntPhone>
<cntAddress addressType="both">
<delPoint>525 S. Lake Ave.</delPoint>
<city>Duluth</city>
<adminArea>MN</adminArea>
<postCode>55802</postCode>
<eMailAdd>kristofor.parson@state.mn.us</eMailAdd>
</cntAddress>
</rpCntInfo>
<role>
<RoleCd value="007"/>
</role>
</idPoC>
<resMaint>
<maintFreq>
<MaintFreqCd value="011"/>
</maintFreq>
</resMaint>
<placeKeys>
<keyword>Minnesota</keyword>
</placeKeys>
<themeKeys>
<keyword>inlandWaters, surface water, water chemistry, water quality</keyword>
<thesaName>
<resTitle>ISO 19115</resTitle>
</thesaName>
</themeKeys>
<searchKeys>
<keyword>Minnesota</keyword>
<keyword>inlandWaters, surface water, water chemistry, water quality</keyword>
</searchKeys>
<resConst>
<LegConsts>
<useLimit>NOTICE: The Geographic Information System (GIS) Data to which this notice is attached are made available pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13). THE GIS DATA ARE PROVIDED TO YOU AS IS AND WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY AS TO THEIR PERFORMANCE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. The GIS Data were developed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agnecy for its own internal business purposes. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency does not represent or warrant that the GIS Data or the data documentation are error-free, complete, current, or accurate. You are responsible for any consequences resulting from your use of the GIS Data or your reliance on the GIS Data. You should consult the data documentation for this particular GIS Data to determine the limitations of the GIS Data and the precision with which the GIS Data may depict distance, direction, location, or other geographic features. If you transmit or provide the GIS Data (or any portion of it) to another user, the GIS Data must include a copy of this disclaimer.</useLimit>
</LegConsts>
</resConst>
<aggrInfo>
<aggrDSName>
<resTitle>More information on surface water assessments, including the impaired waters list, can be found on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's website here: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/minnesotas-impaired-waters-list</resTitle>
</aggrDSName>
<assocType>
<AscTypeCd value="001"/>
</assocType>
</aggrInfo>
<dataExt>
<geoEle>
<GeoBndBox>
<exTypeCode>true</exTypeCode>
<westBL>-97.23</westBL>
<eastBL>-89.53</eastBL>
<northBL>49.37</northBL>
<southBL>43.5</southBL>
</GeoBndBox>
</geoEle>
</dataExt>
<dataExt>
<tempEle>
<TempExtent>
<exTemp>
<TM_Instant>
<tmPosition>2022-05-04</tmPosition>
</TM_Instant>
</exTemp>
</TempExtent>
</tempEle>
</dataExt>
<suppInfo>Minnesota</suppInfo>
</dataIdInfo>
<dqInfo>
<dqScope>
<scpLvl>
<ScopeCd value="005"/>
</scpLvl>
</dqScope>
<report type="DQConcConsis">
<measDesc>These data have been audited to ensure every wetland included in the 305(b) submission to EPA has a corresponding feature in this dataset, and that the use judgments are consistent between this spatial dataset and the assessment database as of the publication date. Date of test: 3/29/2022</measDesc>
</report>
<report type="DQCompOm">
<measDesc>These data contain a feature for every beach in the 305(b) inventory of assessed waters. High-resolution NHD is the primary dataset from which these features are drawn. If no feature exists in the NHD, MPCA staff will digitize a feature.</measDesc>
</report>
</dqInfo>
<mdExtInfo>
<extOnRes>
<linkage>http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/committee/standards/mgmg/metadata.htm</linkage>
</extOnRes>
</mdExtInfo>
<eainfo>
<overview>
<eaover>All wetlands contained in this shapefile are included in the assessed waters dataset prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
AUID: Assessment Unit ID, the DNR DOWLKNUM with hyphens between 2 digit county, 4 digit lake number and 2 digit bay id.
NAME: Name of the waterbody associated with the AUID.
LOC_DESC: A description of the waterbody's location.
USE_CLASS: The use class of the waterbody according to MN statute 7050.0470.
WATER_SIZE: The surface area of the waterbody, in acres according to the National Hydrography Dataset.
AQR: Aquatic Recreation Assessment
FS: Fully Supporting aquatic recreation use
IF: Insufficient Information for an assessment
NA: Not Assessed
NS: Not Supporting aquatic recreation use
AQR_CAT: The CALM category for the Aquatic Recreation use class.
AQR_LAST_AY: The year of the last Aquatic Recreation assessment.
AQL: Aquatic Life Assessment
FS: Fully Supporting aquatic life use
IF: Insufficient Information for an assessment
NA: Not Assessed
NS: Not Supporting aquatic life use
AQL_CAT: The CALM category for the Aquatic Life use class.
AQL_LAST_AY: The year of the last Aquatic Life assessment.
Minnesota's adaptation of the EPA's Consolidation Assessment and Listing Methodology (CALM) categories and subcategories:
1: All designated uses are met and no use threatened.
2: Some uses are met; none are threatened and insufficient data to assess other uses.
3A: No data or information to determine if any designated use is attained.
3B: Data are available for a review and generally indicate non-support, but insufficient data and
information to determine TMDL impairment. (Example: single lake data point showing non-support)
3C: Data available that currently has no assessment tools to allow its use in assessing.
(Example: data with only eco-region expectation standards)
3D: Data are available for a review and generally indicate full support, but insufficient data and
information to assess for category 1 or 2.
3E: Data are available for a review, but insufficient data and information to determine full support or
TMDL impairment. (Example: lake data just below the threshold showing non-support)
4A: Impaired or threatened but all needed TMDLs have been completed*
4B: Impaired or threatened but does not require a TMDL because it is expected to attain standards in
the near future*
4C: Impaired or threatened but does not require a TMDL because impairment not caused by a pollutant*
4D: Impaired or threatened but does not require a TMDL because impairment is solely a result of natural
sources*
5A: Impaired or threatened by multiple pollutants and no TMDL plans approved.
5B: Impaired or threatened by multiple pollutants and either some TMDL plans approved but not all or at
least one impairment is the result of natural conditions.
5C: Impaired or threatened by one pollutant.
* Assessment units falling into category 4 are impaired waters, but are not part of the 303(d) list because of the
reasons given above in the category descriptions. EPA has identified subcategories 4A, 4B, and 4C for classifying a segment, where available data and/or information indicate that at least one designated use is not being supported or is threatened, but a TMDL is not needed. Minnesota has chosen to further subdivide Category 4C into subcategories 4C and 4D to differentiate between cases of impairment due to non-pollutants (4C) and natural background (4D). All category 4 waters appear with the category 5 waters on an impaired waters inventory, which is a comprehensive list of all the current impaired assessment unit/pollutant combinations.</eaover>
</overview>
</eainfo>
</metadata>
