assessed_2020_draft_wetlands 227609.503541 513265.710708 4893396.138708 5078695.408609 1 0.000 Projected GCS_North_American_1983 Linear Unit: Meter (1.000000) NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_15N <ProjectedCoordinateSystem xsi:type='typens:ProjectedCoordinateSystem' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' xmlns:typens='http://www.esri.com/schemas/ArcGIS/10.4'><WKT>PROJCS[&quot;NAD_1983_UTM_Zone_15N&quot;,GEOGCS[&quot;GCS_North_American_1983&quot;,DATUM[&quot;D_North_American_1983&quot;,SPHEROID[&quot;GRS_1980&quot;,6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM[&quot;Greenwich&quot;,0.0],UNIT[&quot;Degree&quot;,0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION[&quot;Transverse_Mercator&quot;],PARAMETER[&quot;False_Easting&quot;,500000.0],PARAMETER[&quot;False_Northing&quot;,0.0],PARAMETER[&quot;Central_Meridian&quot;,-93.0],PARAMETER[&quot;Scale_Factor&quot;,0.9996],PARAMETER[&quot;Latitude_Of_Origin&quot;,0.0],UNIT[&quot;Meter&quot;,1.0],AUTHORITY[&quot;EPSG&quot;,26915]]</WKT><XOrigin>-5120900</XOrigin><YOrigin>-9998100</YOrigin><XYScale>450445547.3910538</XYScale><ZOrigin>-100000</ZOrigin><ZScale>10000</ZScale><MOrigin>-100000</MOrigin><MScale>10000</MScale><XYTolerance>0.001</XYTolerance><ZTolerance>0.001</ZTolerance><MTolerance>0.001</MTolerance><HighPrecision>true</HighPrecision><WKID>26915</WKID><LatestWKID>26915</LatestWKID></ProjectedCoordinateSystem> 20191125 14554900 20191125 14554900 NAP 20260311 00373700 North American Profile of ISO19115 2003 TRUE 1.0 Kristofor Parson Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Data Specialist 218-302-6622 525 S. Lake Ave. Duluth MN 55802 kristofor.parson@state.mn.us 20211115 Assessed Wetlands, Minnesota, 2020 2021-11-15 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minnesota Pollution Control Agency This is a set of the wetlands assessed by MPCA's surface water quality assessment process for the 2020 303(d)/305(b) integrated report to EPA. These wetlands are a subset of the 1:24,000 scale National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). This dataset includes impaired streams which may or may not yet have a TMDL plan approved by the US EPA as well as streams that support their designated uses, and those that had insufficient information to render a support judgment. These data are intended to be used for planning, informational, and cartographic purposes related to surface water quality in Minnesota. Kristofor Parson Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Data Specialist 218-302-6622 525 S. Lake Ave. Duluth MN 55802 kristofor.parson@state.mn.us inlandWaters, surface water, water chemistry, water quality ISO 19115 inlandWaters, surface water, water chemistry, water quality NOTICE: The Geographic Information System (GIS) Data to which this notice is attached are made available pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13). THE GIS DATA ARE PROVIDED TO YOU AS IS AND WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY AS TO THEIR PERFORMANCE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. The GIS Data were developed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agnecy for its own internal business purposes. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency does not represent or warrant that the GIS Data or the data documentation are error-free, complete, current, or accurate. You are responsible for any consequences resulting from your use of the GIS Data or your reliance on the GIS Data. You should consult the data documentation for this particular GIS Data to determine the limitations of the GIS Data and the precision with which the GIS Data may depict distance, direction, location, or other geographic features. If you transmit or provide the GIS Data (or any portion of it) to another user, the GIS Data must include a copy of this disclaimer. true -97.23 -89.53 49.37 43.5 2021-11-15 Minnesota These data have been audited to ensure every waterbody included in the 305(b) submission to EPA has a corresponding feature in this dataset, and that the use judgments are consistent between this spatial dataset and the assessment database as of the publication date. These data contain a feature for every wetland in the 305(b) inventory of assessed waters. High-resolution NHD is the primary dataset from which these features are drawn. If no feature exists in the NHD, MPCA staff will digitize a feature. Statements of horizontal positional accuracy are based on accuracy statements made for U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangle maps. These maps were compiled to meet National Map Accuracy Standards. For horizontal accuracy, this standard is met if at least 90 percent of points tested are within 0.02 inch (at map scale) of the true position. Additional offsets to positions may have been introduced where feature density is high to improve the legibility of map symbols. In addition, the digitizing of maps is estimated to contain a horizontal positional error of less than or equal to 0.003 inch standard error (at map scale) in the two component directions relative to the source maps. Visual comparison between the map graphic (including digital scans of the graphic) and plots or digital displays of points, lines, and areas, is used as control to assess the positional accuracy of digital data. Digital map elements along the adjoining edges of data sets are aligned if they are within a 0.02 inch tolerance (at map scale). Features with like dimensionality (for example, features that all are delineated with lines), with or without like characteristics, that are within the tolerance are aligned by moving the features equally to a common point. Features outside the tolerance are not moved; instead, a feature of type connector is added to join the features. This statement is generally true for the most common sources of NHD data. Other sources and methods may have been used to create or update NHD data. In some cases, additional information may be available from the data provider upon request. http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/committee/standards/mgmg/metadata.htm assessed_2020_draft_wetlands Feature Class 0 FID Internal feature number. Esri Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated. FID OID 4 0 0 Shape Feature geometry. Esri Coordinates defining the features. Shape Geometry 0 0 0 AUID AUID String 12 0 0 NAME NAME String 100 0 0 LOC_DESC LOC_DESC String 120 0 0 USE_CLASS USE_CLASS String 15 0 0 CYCLE_LAST CYCLE_LAST String 4 0 0 WATER_SIZE WATER_SIZE Single 13 0 0 AQR AQR String 2 0 0 AQR_CAT AQR_CAT String 2 0 0 AQL AQL String 2 0 0 AQL_CAT AQL_CAT String 2 0 0 HUC_8 HUC_8 String 8 0 0 Shape_Leng Shape_Leng Double 19 0 0 Shape_Area Area of feature in internal units squared. Esri Positive real numbers that are automatically generated. Shape_Area Double 19 0 0 AUID: The Assessment Unit Identifier - a unique identifier for each water unit in the assessment system. NAME: Name of the feature associated with the AUID. LOC_DESC: The beginning and end points of the beach in NAD 83 Decimal Degrees. USE_CLASS: Use class per MN statute 7050.0470. WATER_SIZE: The length of the reach in miles, according to the National Hydrography Dataset. AQR: Aquatic Recreation Assessment FS: Fully Supporting aquatic recreation use. IF: Insufficient Information for an assessment. NS: Not Supporting aquatic recreation use. None: Has not been assessed for aquatic recreation use. AQR_CAT: The consolidated assessment and listing methodology (CALM) category for the Aquatic Recreation use class. AQR_LAST_A(Y): The most recent year the waterbody was assessed for Aquatic Recreation use. AQL: Aquatic Life Assessment FS: Fully Supporting aquatic life use. IF: Insufficient Information for an assessment. NS: Not Supporting aquatic life use. None: Has not been assessed for aquatic life use. AQL_CAT: The CALM category for the Aquatic Life use class. AQL_LAST_A(Y): The most recent year the waterbody was assessed for Aquatic Life use. Possible CALM category values include: 2: Waterbody’s assessed designated uses are fully supported, the designated use is fully supported, or parameter meets standards. 3: Data insufficient or inconclusive to assess. 4A: Impaired and a TMDL study has been approved by USEPA. 4B: Impaired but a TMDL study is not required because water quality standards are expected to be met in the near future. 4C: Impaired but a TMDL study is not required because the impairment is not caused by a pollutant. 4D: Impaired or threatened but does not require a TMDL because impairment is solely a result of natural sources. 4E: Impaired but existing data strongly suggests a TMDL study is not required because impairment is not caused by a pollutant or is due to natural conditions with only insignificant anthropogenic influence; a final determination of Category 4C or 4D will be made in the next assessment cycle pending confirmation from additional information. 5: Impaired and TMDL study has not been approved by USEPA. None: Has not been assessed for the designated use. Not a CALM category. HUC_8: The code of the 8 digit watershed that the feature is primarily associated with.